One letter, opposite meanings: why the Quran uses 'wind' in both singular and plural
ุฅููููุง ุฃูุฑูุณูููููุง ุนูููููููู ู ุฑููุญูุง ุตูุฑูุตูุฑูุง ููู ููููู ู ููุญูุณู ู ูุณูุชูู ูุฑูู
Innฤ arsalnฤ สฟalayhim rฤซแธฅan แนฃarแนฃaran fฤซ yawmi naแธฅsin mustamirr
Classical scholars noticed a pattern that looks, at first glance, like a minor grammatical detail, but on closer reading is compelling evidence for al-Jurjani's thesis that nothing in the Quran's form is arbitrary. It concerns the Arabic word for "wind": ุฑููุญ (rฤซแธฅ, singular) versus ุฑูููุงุญ (riyฤแธฅ, plural).
Ibn al-Qayyim's observation
The 14th-century scholar Ibn al-Qayyim al-Jawziyya recorded the pattern, tracing it to a report from the companion Ubayy ibn Kaสฟb: "Everything in the Quran with 'winds' (plural) is a mercy; everything with 'wind' (singular) is a punishment."
The verses side by side
Punishment โ singular:
ุฅููููุง ุฃูุฑูุณูููููุง ุนูููููููู ู ุฑููุญูุง ุตูุฑูุตูุฑูุง ููู ููููู ู ููุญูุณู ู ูุณูุชูู ูุฑูู
"Indeed, We sent upon them a screaming wind on a day of continuous misfortune." (Surah al-Qamar 54:19) โ on the destruction of the people of สฟฤd.
Mercy โ plural:
ููู ููู ุขููุงุชููู ุฃููู ููุฑูุณููู ุงูุฑููููุงุญู ู ูุจูุดููุฑูุงุชู ููููููุฐููููููู ู ู ููู ุฑูุญูู ูุชููู
"And among His signs is that He sends the winds as bearers of good tidings, to let you taste of His mercy." (Surah ar-Rum 30:46)
Why this can't be coincidence
Search the entire Quran and the pattern holds: wherever "wind" brings destruction, punishment, or hardship, the singular is used; wherever "wind" brings rain, relief, or mercy, the plural is used. Translations that ignore this distinction โ and many do, since "wind(s)" carries no semantic weight in most other languages โ drop exactly the detail that al-Jurjani's theory of naแบm identifies as the heart of the matter: grammatical form isn't decoration, it carries meaning itself. Swap the singular for the plural in the verse about สฟฤd, and the text would โ grammatically correct but semantically incoherent โ describe a devastating event as a dispersed, plural "good" breeze.
Why destructive wind is singular
Classical commentators point to a further reason: unity and force. A destructive wind strikes concentrated, as a single overwhelming force; rain-bearing winds, by contrast, work precisely through their dispersal โ across fields, clouds, and directions at once. The singular/plural distinction thus carries not only a moral charge (punishment/mercy) but a physical one too: concentrated versus dispersed.
Ibn al-Qayyim al-Jawziyya (Ubayy ibn Kaสฟb)